Wikipedia Homepage, Part Two
I’ve remarked that a lot of people on Hubpages write pieces of writing that are rich in keywords that they believe will probably be popular with search engine users. One piece of writing that obviously gets scores of visitors is an article that talks about the Google home page.
Originally I could comprehend what is the reason anyone might write articles simply regarding Google’s home page, nevertheless, I decided to copy its success by writing about the wikipedia home page. Google Latitude Wikipedia.
Google’s home page is relatively bland and devoid of serious graphics and maybe widgets. Compared to, for example, Yahoo and even Msn, googles’s homepage is uninspiring and minimalist. I was for that reason very surprised to discover that Misha had been getting thousands of web page views monthly because of this site alone at the same time as I always struggle to get a few thousand web site views for pieces of writing I’ve written.
I always found a reply to this mystery once studying the top searches using the Google search engine. Evidently a number of people Google terms for example “Google home page” and even “my own, personal space homepage” and various web sites. Apparently, rather than typing that correct web site for Amazon.com, Myspace.com, and even Google, individuals favored to Google a term and allow the search engine direct them to the clear page. At the same time as I could somewhat realize that people might not know the address of Amazons’s homepage, it’s unfathomable to me that a person would visit google.com and after that Google that term “Google homepage” in order to find the front page of Google. Clearly, no matter who typed in that key word – and there are lots of thousands who do so – should have located Google with the purpose of google that term in the 1st place.
The Wikipedia Effect
This one states something concerning the sophistication of nearly all Web users, in other words the lack of sophistication, that the appear to be becoming more and more dependent upon search engine’s to the most elementary information. Somebody recently wrote a piece of writing which asked “is Google making us dumb?” Google Code Wikipedia.
The respond definitely seems to be yes. Sadly it is not just Google that is softening our minds and analytical abilities by making is dependent on finding all in 2/3 clicks of a search engine result. The Wikipedia homepage and its a large number of non-peer analyzed pieces of writing presents altogether a bonanza of experience including the trivial to the esoteric, and also a threat to the accuracy and verify capability of encyclopedic facts.
Pieces of writing on Wikipedia are written by anonym providers that hide behind usernames. Some are well-meaning aficionados of the theme while others are partisans out to promote a selected agenda and maybe political view. The power of a written word is such that whenever we search for an article, notably the one that sounds scholarly and perhaps authoritative, we guess that it must be accurate. Numerous articles on Wikipedia now backup their statements by reference to released sources for instance sites on the internet and perhaps magazine articles.
Have more Google News Wikipedia data at Google Wikipedia.
